 |
|
|
11-06-2008, 08:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Duggar baby 18
Quote:
__________________
TBcards - http://www.tbcards.com.au mum to Lachlan  (19/07/07) + EDD (9/06/09) ISO - fitted pockets, Whizz Kidz OSFM fitteds, NB/small bamboo fitteds, NB woolies/longies 
|
|
11-06-2008, 09:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Duggar baby 18
lol - me and my sis were both miss j too
 well the only reason i find them 'interesting' is they are the only huge family i have heard of - and i cant get over the religious thing, i dont know anyone very religious either obviously!
__________________
 Joh 
|
|
11-06-2008, 10:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Duggar baby 18
I think they are a strange family the father gives me the creeps,
I feel sorry for the Kids part of a reglious like Cult lol I have nothing against being religious but they are way OTT Renee
|
|
11-06-2008, 01:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Duggar baby 18
Why do you think they are cult like? Why are they way overboard?
__________________
Meg, mum to Charlie(4-12-04) and Asha(23-06-06)
 grumble of the day: Living in a street that only gets dial up or over the top ridiculously exxy wireless. And dh is supposed to be running his web development biz from home now too. So he's on forced holidays.  You'd think we're in woop woop, but no. dh was getting top ADSL just 400m up the road at his old office. Long grr, should've made it a post. 
|
|
11-06-2008, 01:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Duggar baby 18
I was thinking the same Meg? They just seem like a really loving well adjusted family to me, who happen to be very religious. I dont think anyone can make a jusgment about them, cause all we know is what we see in the media, and everyone knows you cannot 'know' someone simply by their portrayal in the media (self portrayal or otherwise).
__________________
Hannah + Houston 24.05.02 + Delilah 30.03.06 + Baby Boy 10.08 
|
|
11-06-2008, 01:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Duggar baby 18
Judas not Jesus LOL Joh
__________________
Leigh WAHM to Imogen & Dominic   
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
